FREE KIC - NO. 101 MAR 16
WAS I REIT AND WAS EDDIE WRONG
In November 2007 I wrote an Opinion Piece about a meeting I went to with Eddie Hobbs and Brendan Investments. In the Opinion Piece I wrote about what was said at that meeting and what was said in a subsequent phone call I had with Eddie.
Here we are almost ten years later and Eddie and Brendan Investments are back in the news and unfortunately the news is not good. In fact it appears that anyone that gave them money will end up losing everything.
Having reread what I wrote back then the thing that jumps out at me the most is how Brendan Investments and the Brendan Investments Pan European Property (BIPEP) fund became something completely different to what I thought it was meant to be. I was told 70% of the money was going to end up in low risk German property (as outlined by Hugh O'Neill at the meeting) and only 30% in riskier development projects in Europe. There was no mention of the possibility that American property might become part of the portfolio (I might have been far more negative in my original opinion piece if I had thought that rundown properties in Detroit could become the only exposure in the fund).
I don't know the full story of what happened but from reading a few newspaper articles I have found out that in the beginning they did invest in Germany. Here is what Mark Paul in the Irish Times had to say:
I have no idea how much of their misfortune in Germany was just bad luck and how much was bad judgement but I do know that the overall German property market has done well over the last ten years. If they had just managed to buy any middle of the road buildings they would have done fine. I therefore find it disappointing to read Eddie say that staying in Germany would have got them nowhere. The following chart from the Bundesbank shows that far from going nowhere the German commercial property market has been a good place to be.
The Brendan Investments team seemed so certain Germany was the place to invest that I presume a lot of soul searching took place before deciding to do something completely different. I would also presume that non-executive members of the board would do just as much soul searching as the executive board members and yet when Mark Paul in the Irish Times asked Eddie (a non-executive director) where the idea for Detroit came from he said the executives (Regan and O'Neill) came up with it and when he asked Eddie where did Regan and O'Neill get the idea from, Eddie said "I don't know". This I find incredible. I would have thought that Eddie should ask lots of difficult and detailed questions about something so important. Eddie did accept that he visited Detroit with all the directors but in his words this was just "for a tour". He wants us to believe that he went all the way to Detroit and didn't bother to ask where the original idea came from!
If there is one thing I have constantly heard about property, it is the old saying that the most important thing is location, location, location. I would therefore assume that the first question any non-executive director would ask is why invest in this location when there are so many potential locations.
I have never been to Detroit and so I have to admit that I know absolutely nothing about the place. The Mark Paul article stated that they focussed their purchases on a district near the University. Once again I can give no opinion as to the merits of this location. All I can say is that the results have been awful.
Given the terrible results achieved in both Germany and Detroit I think I can easily say that Eddie got this particular investment wrong (I have not even mentioned that he was also wrong about peak oil).
Eddie was wrong but can I say that I was Right (or REIT as I phrased it in the title). In other words was I right to invest in a syndicate that bought German supermarkets and was I right that German Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) might also be an interesting way to invest in German property.
I still own Alstria today and the current price is around €11.30 so I've only made a small capital gain. Eddie did say REITs were mainly for income so this is one thing I think I can say Eddie got right because here is a list of the dividends I have received:
At the current share price and the indicated dividend for this year of 52c, Alstria currently trades on a yield of 4.6%. This is a reasonable yield in the current low interest rate environment.
Here is a chart of the Alstria price going all the way back to the day it started trading.
Having bought in Dec 07 I had an interesting situation after the Lehman crisis with the unit price falling below €3 but once the crisis was over a recovery took place.
Overall I've ended up significantly better off than I would have by investing in Brendan Investments so I think I can say it was the REIT thing to do!